Perhaps it is now arguably "too tough" with respect to some wording, possibly its use of "trivial" compositions being something Tolkien himself would have countenanced (and so on). The FAQ is a brief enough eye-opener, and so far I'm going to doubt that the major points in the section about being able to "speak" Elvish have since been overturned. FAQ is concerned, in my opinion it very generally describes the scenario, which might be quite the revelation to many tattoo seekers who think that one can simply translate samples of English (or whatever) into Quenya, as if Quenya was "speakable" in the same sense as Spanish or German, or even an invented language from some other film of book (Star Trek, for example). If you are referring to the book "A Fan's Guide to Neo-Sindarin", its author points the reader to Carl's essay EASIS. If not, it would be better simply to transcribe it with Tengwar without any translation. That is, I can see whether we have attested examples in Quenya which correspond to your requested phrase(s) in grammatical terms. More can be said or I can go into more detail, but enough for If you share what you want to be translated to Quenya, I can see if it has a safe enough sentence structure for translation. Thus new works in the field are far more "based on Tolkien" than older works could ever be (hence Hostetter's praise), to the point that if a new publication debunks a detail in our current understanding of Quenya, it is far more likely to be a case of Tolkien's changing his mind, rather than a realisation by fans that their theories were apparently wrong. page and similar cautionary works and ideas came to be. Because there are now a far greater number of published linguistic notes by Tolkien than there were in the early 2000s, when that F.A.Q. So perhaps it is time that we set aside what we may call a once justifiable prejudice against the usage of Tolkienian languages, and rather start scrutinising individual attempts and request citations (from latest sources!) and so on. Things have changed much since those days. Hostetter, meanwhile he himself admits that it has become obsolete in some ways, and he praises works which one could call a modern version of the "Gateway to Sindarin" (referring to "A Fan's Guide to Neo-Sindarin", against which my criticism is harsher than Hostetter's). ![]() ![]() or directly to the "EASIS" document by C.F. Decades have passed and people (most of whom are not linguistic enthusiasts) still link to the F.A.Q. However the warnings themselves seem to be rather outdated nowadays. Southerner Given the great amount of misinformation, mostly due to outdated sources, on the internet and elsewhere with regard to the languages of Tolkien, I can only approve of comments which aim to warn people about potential issues.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |